rev for 2/4/98
*this segment of the class will consider Steffens as muckraker, then
examine the accuracy of his portrait of bossism and the cities in
light of what occurred in the years 1900-1920.
I. Steffens
*Steffens importance:
In the mid-1980s Pennsylvania State Treasurer Bud Dwyer shot himself
to death before a news conference at the State Capitol, after writing
to the news media to look beyond his suicide to the true story he
wanted told. His conviction on federal bribery conspiracy charges the
previous December, he explained, had been "political persecution" by
the jury, news media, and the FBI, and of "vicious," "vindictive" men
from ex-Governor Dick Thornburgh down. His suicide would draw
attention to the corruption of the entire system. He was going to die
in office, he wrote citing Lincoln Steffens Shame of the Cities, "to 'see if
the shameful facts, spread out in all their shame, will not burn
itself through our civic shamelessness and set fire to American
pride."
**although with less dramatic effect, Steffens' account of urban
corruption in Shame of the
Cities has been a textbook staple since
its appearance more than 90 years ago. Reexamine by looking first at
Steffens career, then his indictment of American cities
I. Steffens
A. Steffens career and influence (paper)
B. Shame of the Cities "Shame of
Minneapolis" in Fitzatrick,
Muckraking
Questions:
1. what explantions does he rule out?
2. what are the problems: commercialism? party loyalty?
lawbreaking?
3. His postion? advocate? scientist? journalist?
4. what makes Shame distinctive as "muckraking"
II. Bossism and Urban Reform: Steffens Reconsidered
A. FACTORS IN EMERGENCE OF THE "MODERN CITY."
*as with economic situation generally, "progressivism" was a response
to a series of dramatic developments which had produced something
quite new in the form of the "modern" U.S. city. For contemporary
discussion by an English observer see James Bryce, American Commonwealth (1888),
chs. 58-68.
B. "Bossism" history and development
*look at reasons bossism developed, to become a distinctive aspect of
the American cities during the 1880s and 1890s. Question the
"bossism" "reform" dichotomy that has dominated interpretation in
this area.
C. "Reform"
*urban reform: changing interpretations. Since the 1950s have been a
succession of implicit and explicit challenges to Steffens.
1. Hofstadter, Age of
Reform
2 a. Hays, Samuel "The Politics of Reform," Pacific Northwest Q [xerox file
level III]
b. Weinstein, James "Organized Business and the City Commission and
Manager Movements," Journal of So.
History 28 (1963), 166-82 [also chapter
4 in his The Corporate
Ideal]
3. Rice, Bradley R. Progressive Cities: The
Commission Government Movement in America 1901-20 (1977). JS342.R55
Schiesl, Martin J., The Politics of
Efficiency: Municipal Administration and Reform in America
1880-1920 (Berkeley: U. Cal, 1977)
JS309.S34
**examination of different views and Shame
of Cities by looking at different forms
and stages of "reform" from "goo goos" (good government) of the
1870s-90s to the "city commission and management" movement.
1. Civil Service and :"goo goo" reform.
2. "Democratizing" (initiatives, referendum, etc.)
* split between ""social" and "structural" reform. (see Hollis, M.
Reform in Detroit: Hazen S. Pingree and
urban politics (1969) [JS838 .H64 ), ch.
8
3. City Manager and Commission.
a. Galveston and its legacy
2. relation between "commission" and "city manager"
3. the crusade and crusaders
4. consequences and legacy.
Written by Robert Bannister, for classroom use in History 44,
Swarthmore College. May be reproduced in whole or part for
educational purposes, but not copied or distributed for profit.